AGENTIC PENETRATION TESTING & SECURITY VALIDATION

Offensive security, automated and assured.

A team of specialist AI agents that pentests your whole surface — web, API, mobile and infrastructure — chains findings into proven attack paths, and keeps what it learns. Expert-depth testing, run safely at machine pace.

EVIDENCE ON EVERY FINDING · MAPPED TO SOC 2PCI-DSSNIS2
caosone — attack-path graph · 32 nodes · 37 edges · 10 paths
MED Source map exposed LOW Build-artifact credential INFO Admin host resolves publicly CRIT8.8 Path to internal admin
confirmedblockedhypothesisevidence at every hop
// The problem

The gap between release pace and test pace

Applications and cloud environments change weekly. Deep testing happens once or twice a year. Everything in between is assumption.

01 · POINT IN TIME

A report describes one date

A signed report is true for the day it was written. Everything shipped after it is untested by that report.

02 · BREADTH WITHOUT PROOF

Scanners give volume, not proof

They don't establish whether a finding is reachable — or what it actually gets an attacker.

03 · CHAINS STAY INVISIBLE

Low + low + low = critical

Three findings unremarkable on their own combine into a critical. That combination is the work a human tester rarely has hours left for.

// The platform

A testing team, not a testing tool

Specialist agents plan, test and validate against your live environment — each picking its next move from what the team already found.

ScopingMappingThreat modelingExecutionAnalysisReporting

iterative loop · new surface → re-map · new evidence → re-model

PLAN

Agents that plan

Next steps come from evidence in hand, not a fixed playbook. Agents read your application to derive its real business logic, then test it.

SAFE

Enforced safety

Scope, approvals and stop controls sit below the model, in the platform — not requested in a prompt.

PROVE

Evidence first

Every finding carries the artifact that proves it; every attack path is built from those artifacts.

KEEP

Knowledge that stays

Each campaign leaves a living knowledge base of your product behind. Meet unknown tech, and the platform builds coverage for it mid-campaign.

Coverage: web · API · mobile · infrastructure — in one campaign, with equal attention to each surface.

// How we compare

Read down the right-hand column

Against a scanner, the difference is reasoning and proof. Against a manual test, it's cadence, uniform depth across surfaces, and capability that accumulates instead of leaving with the consultant.

Dimension
Breach & attack simulation
AI pentest challengers
Consultancy / PTaaS
CaosOne.ai
Business logic
Not attempted
Inferred from responses
Strong, limited by hours
Reads the application to derive real logic, then tests it
Attack chains
Prebuilt playbook paths
Within one surface
Chained where time allows
Cross-surface, every hop backed by an artifact
Coverage
Infrastructure-centric
Web & API
Whatever is scoped
Web, API, mobile & infra in one campaign
Unknown tech
Outside the ruleset
Outside the toolset
Depends on the tester
Coverage is built for it mid-campaign, and kept
Safety model
Pre-agreed windows
Prompt / policy level
Human judgement
Enforced by the platform: scope, approvals, instant stop
What's left behind
A findings queue
A findings queue
A PDF
A living knowledge base the next campaign starts from
// Safety first

Safety enforced below the model — not in a prompt

Autonomous testing is only useful if you can sign off on it. Our controls live in the platform, beneath the agents, so they hold whatever the model decides to do. Design partners run CaosOne against their own production environments.

Signed scope, enforced

Testing stays inside the scope you authorize. Out-of-scope work is denied — at the platform, not on trust.

Tiered approvals

Passive work runs freely; anything intrusive waits for a named human approval before it happens.

Instant stop

One control brings the whole campaign to a clean stop and holds its state — nothing is lost, nothing keeps running.

Isolated & recorded

Each campaign runs isolated; every command and artifact is recorded and can be shipped to your SIEM as it happens.

EVIDENCE, NOT ASSERTION Severity comes from what an attacker can actually reach — every finding is backed by the artifact that proves it, and validated by a senior expert before it reaches you.
// Proof

Design partners, on live production

Our design partners run the platform against their own production environments, and their requirements set the roadmap.

🏥
National healthcare provider
web · API · mobile · desktop
🏭
Global food & beverage corp
infrastructure · OT
🏨
Hospitality chain
external · internal · web
🖥️
Top-tier technology vendor
CI/CD · API · mobile
🚀
Well-funded startups
CI/CD · every release
CASE STUDY · WEB APPLICATION

Full account takeover, from findings nobody rated

The agents read the application to derive its business logic, then combined several individually low-signal issues into a complete account takeover — proven end to end, with the artifact that establishes each hop. No single scanner rule fires on any one of them.

CASE STUDY · INFRASTRUCTURE

Unknown technology, tooled mid-campaign

The environment carried services the platform had never seen. Rather than reporting them out of scope, the platform built the coverage for them during the engagement — and that capability persisted into every campaign that followed.

// Auditor-ready

Findings your auditor already trusts

Every finding is severity-scored, backed by hashed evidence and a full audit trail, and validated by a senior expert — then mapped to the framework you're being assessed against.

SOC 2

Satisfy the penetration-testing expectation for the CC-series controls with a repeatable, evidence-backed test you can run before each audit window.

PCI-DSS

Support Requirement 11 network and application penetration testing with segmentation checks and a documented, scored finding trail.

NIS2

Demonstrate proactive risk management and technical testing to meet EU NIS2 obligations for essential and important entities.

// Team

Built by people who attack for a living

A senior team that has built and attacked together — from a shipped, production offensive platform to years of senior offensive-security delivery for banks, fintechs and critical infrastructure.

Chief Executive Officer
~20 years in offensive security. Former CTO of a security firm (built its DDoS-simulation platform) and Chief Innovation Officer. Military cyber-unit background · CISSP.
Chief Technology Officer
Offensive-tooling & malware-development engineer. Owns the platform and build, with a deep exploitation-research background.
Chief AI Officer
Red team + AI/LLM penetration testing and adversarial ML. Builds tooling to bypass EDR/SIEM and AI-based detection. OSCP+.
Chief Product Officer
Red-teamer & infrastructure lead. Infrastructure, cloud, web and mobile penetration testing across AWS, Azure and GCP.
A senior team — CISSP · OSCP+ · CRTO / CRTP / CARTP family — working to MITRE ATT&CK, OWASP (incl. the LLM Top 10), NIST 800-53 and ISO 27001. The founders are introduced under NDA.
// REQUEST A BRIEFING

See CaosOne against your environment

Tell us a little about your environment and compliance goals, and we'll set up a technical briefing — a walkthrough of the platform and a scoped conversation about where it fits.